From the legislative desk of Senator Nancy Schaefer 50th District of Georgia
IF YOU ARE IN VERMONT AND HAD IT WITH DCF, JOIN TODAY!
|July 29, 2008 UPDATED
UPDATED per “Contempt of Court” THREAT of JAIL for redacted from the BLACK BOOT THUGS. Even the LAST NAME of the kidnapped child’s family can no longer be publicized.
The Vermont kidnappers are citing the child’s “confidentiality” as if that in his “Best Interest“- Saying the child “doesn’t need to grow up with the whole world knowing what went wrong in his life”.
Frankly, the child’s REAL “Best Interest’ would be for the WORLD to know what CPS has done to him and his family.
What went “wrong” in the child’s life IS CPS.
NOTE: The agency certainly publishes pictures of the Legal Orphans AND their first names at the KIDDIE POUND- http://montpelier-vt.adoption.com (scroll to the bottom of that screen). “Confidentiality” is a FARCE, isn’t it? The only confidentiality they really care about is keeping the public from knowing the kid was KIDNAPPED for NO REASON or PHONY REASONS, and DCF certainly did NOT do any such thing as “Reasonable Efforts” to keep the child in his home.
They are violating the CHILD’s FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHT to “be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, SHALL NOT be violated”. Especially for anonymous Hot Line calls and vague allegations.
This makes CPS people everywhere guilty of TREASON against the Constitution of the United States of America and violations of a multitude of U.S. Code several of which are Capital Offenses. But who cares? The Constitution is dead. American Liberty is dead. Fascism rules. WHO CARES?
The redacted family’s situation is just one of thousands suffering under the pandemic plague of Federal Adoption Assistance funding streams. A mere appeal to a state supreme court does little to clean up the contagion of malfeasance, fraud, and corruption in every westernized country in the world.
We are informed that the Vermont thugs consider AFRA an “anti-liberal” website. Yes, we are. The word “Liberal” is merely a modern synonym for COMMUNIST, which is CORRUPTION and treason against and repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.
If you are planning a sight-seeing trip to Vermont, may we suggest “Live Free or Die” New Hampshire instead? If you do business with Vermont, we suggest you take your business elsewhere. If you have a Vermont business, may we suggest moving your business OUT OF VERMONT? If you are a resident of Vermont, may we suggest you FLEE THE STATE with your kids, while you still have them? If you are in any position to financially punish VERMONT, we encourage you to do that. If you are with the FBI, here’s a state full of Public Corruption to go after. We would LOVE to see a bunch of malfeasant CPS people, their colluding contractors, and judges in PRISON. If you are with the OMB, Vermont is a grand place to look for Wasteful Programs.
DCFS threats to take children ruled illegal
By Ofelia Casillas and Matt O’Connor
Chicago Tribune staff reporters – March 15, 2005
A federal judge ruled that Illinois families were deprived of their constitutional rights when state child welfare officials threatened to separate parents from their children during abuse investigations.
In a decision made public Monday, U.S. District Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer found “ample evidence” that families suffered emotional and psychological injuries because the separations lasted “for more than a brief or temporary period.”
….In her decision, Pallmeyer essentially held that DCFS had gone too far in protecting children and had eroded the constitutional rights of parents.
The safety plans are supposedly voluntary agreements by parents in most cases to leave their home indefinitely or stay under constant supervision after investigations into child abuse or neglect are launched, often based on tips to DCFS.
But most of the families who testified at a 22- day hearing in 2002 and 2003 said the investigators threatened to take away their children unless they agreed to the safety plans.
“When an investigator expressly or implicitly conveys that failure to accept a plan will result in the removal of the children for more than a brief or temporary period of time, it constitutes a threat sufficient to deem the family’s agreement coerced, and to implicate due process rights,” Pallmeyer wrote in the 59-page opinion.
“Significantly, [DCFS] has not identified a single family that, faced with such an express or implied threat of protective custody, chose to reject the plan,” the judge said. They don’t know they can. And you can be sure of the retribution for doing so.
Pallmeyer gave DCFS 60 days to develop constitutionally adequate procedures” for families to contest the safety plans.
Diane Redleaf, one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys, said about 10 families were involved in the court case, but that Pallmeyer’s decision would affect thousands of families who agree to safety plans each year.
“Instead of protecting children, the state is actually destroying families and hurting children,” Redleaf said.
Diane Jackson, a DCFS spokeswoman, said Pallmeyer’s review of safety plans was limited to 2002 and before and didn’t consider changes since then.
“We have definitely made changes,” said Jackson, declining to be more specific until DCFS can report to Pallmeyer. They probably dotted an “i” somewhere.
…`No real due process’ Actually, there’s no due process whatsoever.
“It’s abridging both the children’s and the parents’ rights to have that amorphous safety plan that could go on forever,” he said. “There is no real due process. There is no [procedure] to complain unless you have some money to hire a lawyer.” Full Story
Remember, this was in 2005. Numerous cases are going to Supreme Courts for the same decision. Why? It’s already been decided. Coercing parent to sign “volunteer safety plans” IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. As well as everything else CPS does is without CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS.